Posted by Amarachi on Fri 20th Dec, 2024 - tori.ng
In a statement issued on Thursday, December 19, Shehu refuted the narrative, stating that the property in question was allocated to the Muhammadu Buhari Foundation, a non-profit organization established by individuals close to the former president.
Muhammadu Buhari
Garba Shehu, the former spokesperson of Muhammadu Buhari, has noted that the immediate past president is not the owner of the land revoked by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike.
In a statement issued on Thursday, December 19, Shehu refuted the narrative, stating that the property in question was allocated to the Muhammadu Buhari Foundation, a non-profit organization established by individuals close to the former president.
He emphasized that Buhari had no personal connection to the seized land beyond the foundation bearing his name.
According to Shehu, the foundation had lawfully acquired the land with support from well-meaning Nigerians but encountered bureaucratic hurdles when the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) presented an unusually high bill for the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
“This bill was far higher than what was typically charged to similar organizations,” he said, adding that the revocation of the property rights came as no surprise
He further stressed that Buhari, during his tenure, had demonstrated a personal disinterest in acquiring additional land in Abuja.
“When he and his cabinet members were invited to apply for land in the FCT, he returned the form unfilled, stating that he already owned a plot and that others without land should benefit instead,” Shehu explained.
The former spokesperson lashes out commentators spreading misinformation about the alleged seizure, urging them to verify their facts before making baseless claims.
“Let those jumping up and down in the digital space get their facts right and stop dragging the name of the former president into baseless controversies,” Shehu said.
Shehu, however, reiterated Buhari’s integrity and commitment to selflessness throughout his public service, positioning the clarification as an attempt to protect the former president’s legacy.