Amole noted that there is no law that says that a Chief Imam of a town must take permission from the traditional ruler before he can embark on a journey.
The Soun of Ogbomoso, Oba Afolabi Ghandi Olaoye has been berated by a lawyer for issuing a query to the Chief Imam of the town, Sheik Teliat Yunus Ayilara.
Ibadan-based lawyer, Barrister Abiodun Amole declared the query as null and void.
Amole noted that there is no law that says that a Chief Imam of a town must take permission from the traditional ruler before he can embark on a journey.
Amole made these declarations via a statement made available to DAILY POST on Thursday.
It could be recalled that the Soun of Ogbomoso, Oba Afolabi Ghandi Olaoye had issued a query to the Chief Imam for going to Saudi Arabia to perform Hajj exercise without informing him. https://dailypost.ng/2024/06/27/hajj-soun-of-ogbomoso-issues-query-to-chief-imam/
But, the legal practitioner in his reaction, noted that the cleric is not in any way whatsoever accountable to the monarch.
Amole said, “Viewed strictly from the legal perspective, the issuance of a query by the Soun of Ogbomoso, Oba Afolabi Ghandi Olaoye to the Chief Imam of the predominantly Muslim town for traveling to Saudi Arabia to perform the hajj without informing the monarch is clearly illegal and of no moment.
“There is no law that provides that a Nigerian citizen shall inform or seek the permission of another citizen before travelling or exercising his constitutionally – guaranteed right to freedom of movement as enshrined in Section 41(1) of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999(as amended).
“Furthermore, article 13(1) & (2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights & Article 12(1) & (2) of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights also guarantee that right.
“The right to freedom of movement is therefore a universal and inalienable right of the Chief Imam of Ogbomoso which the Soun cannot deprive him unilaterally under whatever guise.
“Notwithstanding the alleged undertaking he made, the cleric cannot be deprived of his constitutional right to freedom of movement.
“More so, when the law is well settled that a statutory provision cannot be waived or glossed over but must be given effect no matter what. The action of the Soun is in the circumstance extra – constitutional, unjustifiable, null and void and of no consequence or effect whatsoever.
“Constitutional provisions are extremely sacrosanct, non-negotiable and must therefore be strictly given effect at all times.
“In a nutshell, the cleric is not in any way or manner whatsoever accountable to the monarch as to how he exercises his constitutional right to freedom of movement.”